The Head of the Church | Robert Shaw

Screenshot 2016-05-03 18.25.39The following is an excerpt from An Exposition of the Westminster Confession of Faith by Robert Shaw.


There is no other head of the Church but the Lord Jesus Christ. Nor can the Pope of Rome, in any sense, be head thereof; but is that Antichrist, that man of sin, and son of perdition, that exalts himself, in the Church, against Christ and all that is called God (WCF 25.6).

Exposition

That the Lord Jesus Christ is the alone head of the Church must be maintained, not only in opposition to Papists, who affirm that the Pope of Rome, as the successor of Peter and the vicegerent of Christ, is the head of the universal Church; but also in opposition to Erastians, who make the supreme magistrate the head of the Church within his own dominions.

A universal headship or dominion belongs to Christ. As God, he has a natural and essential right to rule and dispose of all creatures at his pleasure, and for the manifestation of his own glory. As Mediator, he has a universal headship by donation from the Father. It is said (Eph. i. 22), the Father “gave him to be the head over all things to the Church;” where, it is to be observed, the apostle is not treating of Christ’s headship over the Church, but of his universal headship as Mediator. He is constituted head “over all things;” but this power is delegated to him that he may overrule all things for the good of the Church; and therefore he is said to be head “over all things to the Church,” or for her benefit.. But Christ has a peculiar headship over the Church, which is his body. This is expressly asserted (Col. i. 18): “He is the head of the body, the Church.” Here he is compared to the head of the natural body; and in Eph. v. 23, he is declared to be the head of the Church, as the husband is the head of the wife.

To the visible Church Christ is a head of government and direction. He is the “Ruler in Israel,” and “the government shall be upon his shoulder.”—Isa. ix. 6. “Yet have I set my King,” says Jehovah, “upon my holy hill of Zion.” Ps. ii. 6. To him it belongs to enact laws for his Church —to institute the ordinances of worship, and the form of government to be observed by her—to appoint her office-bearers, and to prescribe the manner of their admission into office. To the Church invisible Christ is not only a head of government and direction, but also of vital influence. Hence he is called “the head, from which all the body, by joints and bands, having nourishment ministered, and knit together, increaseth with the increase of God.”—Col. ii. 19. Christ is the sole and exclusive head of the Church, whether considered as visible or as invisible. His authority alone is to be acknowledged by the Church, as her supreme Lawgiver. Her language must ever be: “The Holy One of Israel is our king.” Let men distinguish as they will, but as a body with more heads than one would be a monster in nature, so the Scripture clearly shows that the body of Christ, which is the Church, is no such monster. As there is “one body,” so there is only “one Lord.” Christ has not delegated his authority either to popes or princes; and though he is now in heaven as to his bodily presence, yet he needs no depute to act for him in the Church below. Before he ascended up on high, he gave this precious promise to his disciples: “Lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world:” and “where two or three are gathered together in his name, there he is in the midst of them.” – Matt. xxviii. 20, xviii. 20.

Daring encroachments have been often made upon this royal prerogative of Christ, both by ecclesiastical and civil powers. Long has the Man of Sin and Son of Perdition blasphemously arrogated universal headship and lordly dominion; and when the Reformation took place in England, the headship over the Church was only transferred from the Roman Pontiff to the British Sovereign. Henry VIII. was recognised as “supreme head of the Church of England;” and it was enacted, “that the king, his heirs, &c., shall be taken, accepted, and reputed, the only supreme head on earth of the Church of England, called Anglicana Ecclesia; and shall have and enjoy, annexed and united to the imperial crown of this realm, as well the title and style thereof as all honours, dignities, immunities, profits, and commodities to the said dignity of supreme head of the said Church belonging and appertaining.” It was also enacted, that his majesty hath full authority to exercise “ecclesiastical jurisdiction;” and ” that the archbishops and bishops, have no manner of jurisdiction ecclesiastical, but by, under, and from the royal majesty.” In the commencement of Queen Elizabeth’s reign, the metaphorical term head was changed into supreme govenor; but both terms signify the same thing. No part of the power or authority which had been possessed by her royal predecessors was relinquished; for, at the same time, it was enacted, that “all jurisdictions—spiritual and ecclesiastical— should for ever be united and annexed to the imperial crown.” This sacrilegious usurpation of spiritual authority, and impious invasion of Christ’s sovereignty, is sanctioned by the Church of England, in her 37th Article. It runs thus: “The queen’s majesty hath the chief power in this realm of England, and other her dominions; under whom the chief government of all estates of this realm, whether they be ecclesiastical or civil, in all causes doth appertain.” Some Churchmen, indeed, seem to be ashamed of recognising the sovereign as head or supreme governor of the Church, and have attempted to palliate or explain away the real import of the title. But the attempt is vain; of the spiritual jurisdiction which the title involves, and of the Erastian bondage under which the Church of England is held, numerous proofs can be easily adduced. Who knows not, for example, that the appointment of all her bishops belongs to the sovereign—that her clergy cannot meet in convocation without the permission of her majesty; and that the convocation has actually been suspended, or virtually abolished, for upwards of a century? That a Church so completely fettered is utterly powerless for the suppression of heresy and for the exercise of discipline recent events have too clearly demonstrated.

The Church of Scotland, at the era of the Reformation, nobly asserted, and practically vindicated, the sole headship of Christ. This was especially the grand and leading principle of the Second Reformation; and it was in the way of contending for the royal prerogatives of Christ, as her alone king and head, and resisting the Erastian encroachments of aspiring princes upon her spiritual liberties, that many of her sons suffered bonds and exile, and shed their blood in fields and on scaffolds. Though the sole headship of Christ is explicitly asserted in our Confession of Faith, yet it is deeply to be regretted that this vital principle was not more effectually guarded in the Revolution Settlement. The Act 1592, upon which the Church was erected at this time, contained no acknowledgement of the headship of Christ; and it was not formally asserted by any act of the General Assembly. Though a regal supremacy was neither directly claimed by the Crown nor conceded by the Church, yet it was not long till it was virtually exercised. The meetings of the General Assembly were repeatedly dissolved and prorogued by the sovereign; and, in 1703, when the Assembly had prepared the draft of an act for the purpose of asserting the supremacy of Christ, the intrinsic power of the Church, and the divine right of the Presbyterian government, it was abruptly dissolved by her majesty’s commissioner, without any recorded protest. “But ecclesiastical independence was still more invaded, and spiritual interests more effectually subjected to secular dominion, by the restoration of the power of lay-patrons, after it had been repeatedly abolished. The power of patronage, when it is of any real effect in the settlement of the vacant churches, flows from the same spring with the ecclesiastical supremacy, and can neither be vindicated nor condemned, but on the same principles with it; and is indeed, when exercised by the Crown, a branch of it.” Without referring particularly to those recent struggles of the Church to vindicate her spiritual independence, which have issued in the disruption of the Scottish Establishment, there is nothing, it may be remarked, more clearly evinced by these events, than the determined resolution of the State to retain and exercise an Erastian power over the Church. But the Christian people of Scotland have given the most unequivocal proofs of their continued and firm attachment to the sole supremacy of Christ as “king in Zion”—a truth in defence of which their ancestors “loved not their lives unto the death.” They cannot contend or suffer in a nobler cause. Those who assume a headship over the Church of Christ, are guilty of an impious usurpation of his prerogatives; and his faithful subjects are bound to display their loyalty to him, by asserting his sole right to reign and rule in his own Church, and by giving no countenance to a claim so degrading to the Church, and so dishonouring to her alone king and head.

 

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “The Head of the Church | Robert Shaw

  1. The pope and the RC church teaches that the pope is the vicar of Christ on earth and sits in His place. The word antichrist does not always mean openly opposed to Christ, but putting something in the place of Christ. Any person teaching any way to God, excepting through Christ, is Antichrist. Any person teaching any way of salvation, excepting through the blood of Christ, is Antichrist. John says that in his day, “Now are there many antichrists.” 1 John 2:18. The papal church, putting its traditions in the place of the Scriptures, putting the Virgin Mary, the saints, the Pope, the priest, good works, the mass, purgatory, etc., as the way of salvation, in place of salvation by faith in the Lord Jesus Christ, is pre-eminently Antichrist.

    It was under the papacy of Joseph Ratzinger I began to read and study the bible and I had my eyes opened by the grace of God to see that the Roman Catholic Church was not ever and is not now the means and path to salvation. I began to see clearly as others who read the scriptures that the means of salvation is by Faith alone in Christ alone and all grace is a free gift from God alone. It is scripture alone which is our only and final authority and never any man let alone the pope of Rome.

    I am as many know an ex Roman Catholic and I renounce the pope of Rome and any allegiance to him and any successors. I renounce my former Roman Catholic faith completely. I renounce my membership in the Roman Catholic church. I now embrace the true gospel of grace in the fellowship of the Presbyterian church. However the church does not save, only faith alone in Christ alone saves and all by Gods free gift of grace alone. There are no meritorious works I or anyone can do to be saved, We do good works as we become sanctified in Christ but I renounce the RC teaching of faith and works and her sacramental system of salvation.

    We are as I said saved by faith alone in Christ alone. I believe that the bible is our only and final authority and never any man and not the pope of Rome. I do not and will never again refer to him as the Holy Father for there is only one Father, God almighty to whom all praise and glory is given to Him alone and His Son Jesus Christ and all in the Trinity of one God including the third person, the Holy Spirit.

    I now subscribe as a Presbyterian to the original Westminster Confession of Faith.
    Dudley Davis

    Like

  2. “Little children, it is the last time: and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even now are there many antichrists; whereby we know that it is the last time” (1 John 2:18).

    The apostle John warned the church of THAT ANTICHRIST. That Antichrist is not one individual, but a succession of men. The office of papacy is Antichrist. Just like we understand the high priest in the Old Testament to mean an office of men (not one individual).

    The Pope of Rome is a liar! “Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son” (1 John 2:22). The Pope of Rome teaches that Jesus Christ is the Head of the church, but he also claims to be the Head. This is like a demon who believes in Jesus, but is still a demon.

    The names or titles that he goes by make it obvious that he is The Antichrist. He is called “Holy Father” or “Papa”. Also, he wears a fancy hat that says, “Vicar of Christ.” This translates to Antichrist (think of the word vicarious).

    The Gnostics, Marcionites, Docetists, Valentinians, and many other cults like the Mormons are antichrists. However, the Pope of Rome is The Antichrist who is the most wicked, powerful, and deceptive man of sin in the world.

    Praise God that you came out of the Whore of Babylon. I am an ex papist myself, and have been saved by the grace of God.

    May the Triune Jehovah bless you and keep you,

    Emilio Del Toro

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s